Italy is currently the most represented country on the List, with 58 properties inscribed.
UNESCO, organised in the 5 Sectors of Education; Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and Humanities; Communication and Information; and Culture, bases its mandate on the following themes:
- Education for the 21st century
- Strengthen freedom of expression
- Protect our heritage and strengthen creativity
- Learning to live together
- Build societies based on knowledge
- One planet, one ocean
- Science for a sustainable future
UNESCO currently has 193 Member States and 11 Associate Members.
UNESCO’s governing bodies are the General Conference and the Executive Board. The General Conference brings together every two years all the representatives of the Member States, in order to establish the policies, programmes and budget of the Organisation. It also elects the members of the Executive Board and, every four years, the Director-General. The overall management of UNESCO, the work and control of the implementation of the decisions taken by the General Conference are carried out by the Executive Board, which consists of 58 Member States and meets twice a year.
UNESCO’s executive body is the Secretariat, which consists of the Director General and Staff. The Director is responsible for enforcing the commitments made by the Member States. UNESCO’s current Director-General is Audrey Azoulay, who was elected in 2017.
More information can be found on UNESCO’s official website: http://en.unesco.org/
The World Heritage Committee:
- is responsible for the implementation of the Convention
- determines the use of the World Heritage Fund, providing funding to States Parties that have requested it;
- assesses nominations submitted by States Parties to be inscribed on the List;
- examines the State of Conservation of properties;
- requests States Parties to intervene if it considers that the property is not being adequately managed;
- decides on the inclusion or removal of properties from the List of World Heritage in Danger
The Bodies in charge of the implementation of the Convention are divided into:
- Culture Sector and Natural Sciences Sector within UNESCO
- World Heritage Centre
- Advisory Bodies –ICOMOS, ICCROM and IUCN
Italian National Bodies
As of today (2022), the World Heritage List consists of 1154 properties located in 167 States Parties, of which:
- 43 are transboundary
- 3 have been removed from the World Heritage List
- 52 have been placed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
- 897 cultural
- 218 natural
- 39 mixed
Outstanding Universal Value
The Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) is the basis for any inscription on the World Heritage List. It is defined as the cultural and/or natural significance of a property that is so great that it crosses national boundaries and becomes important for all present and future generations of humanity. The evaluation of the OUV of each property is an essential step in order to inscribe a property on the List. For a property to be considered of having Outstanding Universal Value, it must meet one or more selection criteria, satisfy the conditions of Integrity and Authenticity and have an adequate protection and management system to ensure its preservation.
During the nomination process, States Parties present the OUV of the proposed property in the form of a Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, which not only represents the reasons as to why each property is listed, but also serves as a reference point for developing its Management Plan (MP). The Statement is composed of brief synthesis, criteria, integrity and authenticity, as well as protection and management requirements.
Criterion (i): to represent a masterpiece of human creative genius;
Criterion (ii): to exhibit an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town-planning or landscape design;
Criterion (iii): to bear a unique or at least exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization which is living or which has disappeared;
Criterion (iv): to be an outstanding example of a type of building, architectural or technological ensemble or landscape which illustrates (a) significant stage(s) in human history;
Criterion (v): to be an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or sea-use which is representative of a culture (or cultures), or human interaction with the environment especially when it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change;
Criterion (vi): to be directly or tangibly associated with events or living traditions, with ideas, or with beliefs, with artistic and literary works of outstanding universal significance. (The Committee considers that this criterion should preferably be used in conjunction with other criteria);
Criterion (vii): to contain superlative natural phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty and aesthetic importance;
Criterion (viii): to be outstanding examples representing major stages of earth’s history, including the record of life, significant on-going geological processes in the development of landforms, or significant geomorphic or physiographic features;
Criterion (ix): to be outstanding examples representing significant on-going ecological and biological processes in the evolution and development of terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and marine ecosystems and communities of plants and animals;
Criterion (x): to contain the most important and significant natural habitats for in-situ conservation of biological diversity, including those containing threatened species of outstanding universal value from the point of view of science or conservation.
Integrity is a measure of the wholeness and intactness of the natural and/or cultural heritage and its attributes. Examining the conditions of integrity, therefore requires assessing the extent to which the property:
a) includes all elements necessary to express its outstanding universal value;
b) is of adequate size to ensure the complete representation of the features and processes which convey the property’s significance;
c) suffers from adverse effects of development and/or neglect.
Only for cultural properties. Depending on the type of cultural heritage and its cultural context, properties may be understood to meet the conditions of authenticity if their cultural values (as recognized in the nomination criteria proposed) are truthfully and credibly expressed through a variety of attributes including:
• form and design;
• materials and substance;
• use and function;
• traditions, techniques and management systems;
• location and setting;
• language, and other forms of intangible heritage;
• spirit and feeling; and
• other internal and external factors.